What I have been trying to determine is: Does Closed mean we're going to fix it before the GM, or does it mean the security team has decided that denying access to command-line helpers is intended behavior. I explained this in Bug 42602218 on July 25, and this bug has recently been marked Closed Duplicate 41034701. It did work until Beta 4, although I had to explicity add the helper to the Application Data Full Disk Access whitelist. Sheep-Sys-Worker open on /Users/jk/Library/Safari/ist: Operation not permitted I found this in the Console after testing: The result is that access to Mojave-protected files is still apparently denied by System Integrity Protection. Identifier=Īs you can see, (1) the bundle identifier is stated in the embedded ist of the helper tool Sheep-Sys-Worker, (2) it is a child of the main app's bundle identifier, and (3) it matches the tool's code signing identifier. To verify:ĪCA80003 jk$ otool -s _TEXT _info_plist "/Applications/BookMacster.app/Contents/Helpers/Sheep-Sys-Worker" | xxd -rĪCA80003 jk$ cat "/Applications/BookMacster.app/Contents/ist"ĪCA80003 jk$ codesign -d -vvv /Applications/BookMacster.app/Contents/Helpers/Sheep-Sys-WorkerĮxecutable=/Applications/BookMacster.app/Contents/Helpers/Sheep-Sys-Worker My build now meets the three requirements you stated. I haven’t yet researched all of the details of this issue but it’s clearly all about code identity, and messing up one or more of the above is a common cause of code being misidentified.Īpple Developer Relations, Developer Technical Support, Core OS/Hardware let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + you, Quinn. $ codesign -d -v /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools/ 2>&1 | grep Identifier You can dump the code signing identifier using codesign -d -vvv /path/to/your/tool. Have a code signing identifier that matches its bundle ID? Have that bundle ID as a ‘child’ of the app’s bundle ID?įor example, your app might be and your bundle ID might be. To get this, set both the “ist File” ( INFOPLIST_FILE) and the “Create ist Section in Binary” ( CREATE_INFOPLIST_SECTION_IN_BINARY) build settings. Have a bundle ID, set via the _info_plist section in the executable? With regards helper tools, does your tool: You can still debug your app if you disable SIP □ to other developers: The new restrictions are apparently implemented with System Integrity Protection (SIP). app packages, the user must hit the + button, then ⌘⇧G, then enter the absolute path to the helper. (*) To enter a helper component such as this into the whitelist, because the navigation sheet presented by the + button will not navigate into. Was the breaking of command line tools in Beta 4 intentional? There is maybe only four weeks to go, and it appears that I have a lot of work to do. If anyone can confirm, deny, or elaborate on these conclusions, I would really appreciate it. The helper/child must itself be explicitly present in the whitelist. app will enable its main executable and any child processes, it will not enable a helper/child app when the helper/child is launched by others in the background. app, although it is OK for this whitelisted app to be a helper/child of another app, located in the parent app's Contents/Library.Īlthough whitelisting a certain. Therefore, I conclude that, in order for a executable to be granted Full Disk Access, it must be… (Unfortunately, the whitelist does not show an item's path in any way – no tooltip.) app already entered into the whitelist, and + add another copy, the whitelist silently remains the same, showing only one entry for the duplicated app. After I similarly enter /Applications/Arq.app/Contents/Library/Arq Agent.app into the whitelist, overnight backups in the background by the backup app which I use, Arq, start working again.app, this command-line tool will be denied access when it runs. Even if the full path to a command-line Helper tool which my app contains ( /Applications/MyApp.app/Contents/Helpers/MyHelper) is explicitly entered into the Full Disk Access list (*), and it appears in the whitelist separately from my.app, it gets access as expected, but only if it is located in /Applications, and not attached to by lldb (not running in Xcode). If I click the + button under the whitelist and enter my.Because we are still anxiously awaiting the documentation on the workings of the whitelist in System Preferences > Security and Privacy > Full Disk Access (previously Application Data in earlier betas), I report the following experimental results with macOS 10.14 Beta 7 (18A365a):
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |